Coursework Writing Logo

What paraphrasing is really for

Paraphrasing is the workhorse of academic writing. You will use it in almost every essay, report and literature review you produce, often dozens of times before you hand in a single piece of work. Yet it is also the skill students feel least confident about, and the one most likely to trip you up when you are tired, rushed and working close to a deadline.

It helps to remember why we do it. Your marker is not asking you to disguise a source. They are asking you to demonstrate that you have understood an idea well enough to explain it in your own words and then place it in a conversation with other ideas, including your own. A strong paraphrase changes the sentence structure and the vocabulary while preserving the original meaning exactly — and it always carries a citation. If the citation is missing, the meaning is distorted, or the wording is only lightly rearranged, you are no longer paraphrasing. You are risking accidental plagiarism.

Two mistakes account for most of the trouble. The first is patchwriting: keeping the original sentence and swapping in a few synonyms. The second is the opposite problem — drifting so far from the source that the argument has changed and your citation now attributes to the author something they never claimed.

Read once for sense, then once for structure

You cannot rewrite a passage you do not fully understand, so slow down at the start. Read the paragraph through once without taking notes, just to get the gist. Then read it again and note down the underlying structure: what claim is being made, what evidence supports it, what qualification or limitation comes with it.

Put the original text aside — physically aside, face down or on another screen — and write the idea from your notes. That small act of separation is the single most effective thing you can do, because it forces your brain to reconstruct the meaning rather than copy the phrasing. If you find you cannot write anything without the original in front of you, that is useful information: you need to read more, not write sooner.

Techniques that change a sentence, not just its adjectives

When you know what you want to say, use structural moves rather than a thesaurus:

• Change the grammatical subject. If the source says "The study found that…", you might write "Working-class students' attainment emerged as the central concern of the research."
• Reverse the order. Start with the conclusion and work back to the reasoning, or move the qualification to the front.
• Break one long sentence into two, or join two short ones with a logical connector such as because, although or consequently.
• Nominalise or de-nominalise. Turn "the implementation of the policy was delayed" into "the policy was implemented late".
• Compare and contrast within your own sentence: "Where Bennett emphasises funding, Okafor points to staffing."

What you should not do is hunt for synonyms for the technical terms. In most disciplines, the key vocabulary is precise and shared for good reason. Paraphrase the argument, keep the terminology.

Keeping your own voice in the room

Your academic voice lives in three places: your reporting verbs, your level of certainty, and the way you connect a source to your argument. Choose reporting verbs carefully, because they carry judgement. Argues, asserts, concedes, observes and demonstrates are not interchangeable, and a marker will notice when you use them loosely.

Then add something of your own. A paraphrase followed by a comment — "This distinction matters here because…", "The evidence is persuasive, though it rests on a small sample" — shows you are thinking with the source rather than simply relaying it. Keep your hedging consistent too. If you write "this suggests" in one paragraph and "this proves" in the next, your reader will wonder which you actually mean. Many students find it useful to keep a running list of the connectives and evaluative phrases they already use naturally, building a personal style rather than borrowing stock academic filler from every source they read.

Citing while you paraphrase

Paraphrases need references just as quotations do. Integrate them so the citation supports your sentence rather than interrupting it:

• Author-prominent: "Ahmed (2018, p. 44) argues that widening participation targets have shifted institutional priorities."
• Idea-prominent: "Widening participation targets have been said to shift institutional priorities (Ahmed, 2018)."
• Close paraphrase: include a page number when you have followed the original's reasoning step by step, not just its general point.
• Multiple sources: order them consistently and check your department's style guide for the punctuation.

Every in-text citation must appear in your reference list, and every entry in your reference list must be cited somewhere. That two-way match catches more accidental plagiarism than any amount of anxious rereading.

A five-minute check before you submit

• Cover the source and read your sentence aloud — does it stand on its own?
• Highlight any run of four or more words that also appears in the original, then rewrite those stretches.
• Reverse the test: can you explain your paraphrase back to the original text without adding or losing anything?
• Ask whether the sentence says what the author meant, not merely something similar.
• Check that your own judgement appears somewhere nearby.

If you are unsure, take the draft to your university's academic skills team or your subject librarian. They see paraphrasing questions every day, and asking early is a sign of a careful writer, not a struggling one.